Parkinson's Law in IT

"As computer hardware capacity increases, softwareThis is but one example of Parkinson's Law as applied
becomes more bloated."in computing.An another example, let's consider data
- Bryce's LawINTRODUCTIONEver wonder why ourtransmission lines as used in networking. It doesn't
computers typically last no more than three years?seem long ago we were using 14.4 baud modems
Many contend it is because of the fast pace ofover telephone lines. I remember when we doubled
technological advancements. Maybe. But I tend tothe speed to 28.8 and then 56.4. It seemed like the
believe there is a little more to it than just that,sky was the limit with every increase. But eventually
namely "Parkinson's Law." For those of you who mayperformance seemed to slow to a crawl. Was it
have forgotten, "Parkinson's Law" was devised by C.because the technology was aging or was it because
Northcote Parkinson, noted British historian andour web pages were becoming bigger and more
author. His original book, "Parkinson's Law: The Pursuitcomplicated requiring greater data volume over the
of Progress," was introduced in 1958 and was alines? Frankly, it was the latter. Today, DSL and cable
top-selling management book for a number of yearsare commonplace in households as well as in business
(it is still sold today). The book was based on hisand "dial-up" is rapidly becoming a thing of the past.
experience with the British Civil Service. Among hisBut as data volume increases with the number of
key observation's was that "work expands so as tosubscribers, will we ever hit a wall in terms of
fill the time available for its completion." Basically, hecapacity with DSL and cable? Undoubtedly. Again,
suggests that people make work in order tomore due to Parkinson's Law then anything else.Make
rationalize their employment. Consequently, managersno mistake, computer hardware and software
create bureaucracies and superfluous work to justifyvendors are acutely aware of the role of Parkinson's
their existence, not because it is really needed.As anLaw. It is what allows them to build-in planned
aside, CEO's clearly understood Parkinson's Law,obsolescence into their products. As consumers reach
which became the driving force behind the flatteningcapacity, they can either add additional capacity or,
of corporations in the 1990's, such as General Electricmore likely, purchase new computers.There is
under Jack Welch's reign.AS APPLIED TOundoubtedly an incestuous relationship between
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYWhereas Parkinsonhardware and software vendors. Hardware
was primarily concerned with people, his law is equallyenhancements are primarily implemented to increase
applicable to machines, particularly computers; forcapacity in order to overcome software
example, Parkinson's Law can be applied toinefficiencies, and software vendors make their
computing in terms of "Data expands to fill the spaceproducts more bloated as hardware enhancements
available for storage." Years ago I had a Compaqare introduced. To illustrate the point, is it a
Presario computer with 50mb of disk space, which Icoincidence that every major release of Windows
considered substantial at the time. I never dreamt Irequires additional hardware support? Hardly. This is
would be able to fill up the hard drive. But, of course,done more by design than by
I did (as well as other PC's I have had over theaccident.CONCLUSIONParkinson's Law is just as much
years). My current PC has a hard drive with aa part of computer technology as it is in the
capacity of 224gb and though I'm a long way fromcorporate world. But what would happen if we
filling it up, inevitably I know I will for two reasons: Idecided to "flatten" computer technology in the same
now feel more comfortable with downloading largemanner that Jack Welch flattened G.E.? Keep in mind,
multimedia files (MP3, AVI, WMV, etc.), PDF files,Welch did so to eliminate bureaucracy and force his
data base files, and other larger file formats, and;workers to become more efficient and focus on the
Second, because developers have become sloppy intrue problems at hand. By flattening the "bloatware"
programming.Back when memory and disk spacewe would probably get a lot more mileage out of our
were at a premium, there was great concern overcomputers. But I guess that wouldn't be good for
the efficient use of computer resources. Programselling computers (or the economy).I guess
code was written very tightly and consideration wasParkinson's Law and the viscous circle of computing
given to file size. For example, establishing a simplewill be with us for quite some time.Tim Bryce is the
file index was scrutinized carefully. But as theManaging Director of M. Bryce & Associates (MBA)
computer capacity grew and hardware pricesof Palm Harbor, Florida, a management consulting firm
declined, developers became less interested inspecializing in Information Resource Management
efficient programming. To illustrate, not too long ago(IRM). Mr. Bryce has over 30 years of experience in
packaged software installation programs werethe field. He is available for training and consulting on
delivered on 3.5" diskettes. Today, it is notan international basis. His corporate web page is at:
uncommon to use multiple CD's to install the samecan be contacted at: Copyright 2006 MBA. All rights
products. This means that as computer hardwarereserved.
capacity increases, software becomes more bloated.